Profiles in Video Games: Nintendo's Leading Ladies

Video games hold a lot of great characters, from heroes to villains, and everyone in between. It makes sense since a video game is usually an interactive story, one where the player controls the action. That said, there has been a definite tilt in the favor of male characters over female ones… at least where the main action is concerned. Nintendo is one of the more influential game companies, and also a company that has been very vocal over inclusive gaming. There has been no console like the Wii in terms of bringing new players to the table. So, since Nintendo has been talking the talk, are they walking the walk (yes, I know that term is incredibly outdated). In examining five prominent Nintendo female characters, it is clear that the big N still has a long way to go.

Princess Peach

Let’s start with the most famous example: Princess Peach Toadstool.

Princess_Peach_NSMBWWhere She Started: There is perhaps no more famous damsel-in-distress in history. Peach has been kidnapped no less than thirteen times. That number comes after a quick count so the actual number may be higher. Peach represents royalty without power. She is only a princess after all – there is a Mushroom King. Granted, this figure is never seen, so Peach is the face of the ruling family. Yet, despite her many appearances (Peach has appeared in more games than any other female character in history), Princess Peach doesn’t have much character. Who is she besides the doe-eyed passive princess dressed in pink?

Has There Been Recent Improvement: Yes. Princess Peach is no longer just an objective to be accomplished. Recently, Peach has begun taking a more active role in gaming – outside of the Mario Party/Sports titles. Peach appears alongside Mario and Luigi as a playable character in the new Super Mario 3D World. The character also finally received her own game for the DS, Super Princess Peach, where she was the solo protagonist. Is there still more work to be done: absolutely. At least the Princess is moving in a more modern direction.

It had been a long time since Peach had been playable in a Mario game.
It had been a long time since Peach had been playable in a Mario game.

Princess Zelda

The titular character in the Legend of Zelda series, Princess Zelda is the (usual) ruler of Hyrule.

Princess_Zelda_(Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl)

Where She Started: Like Peach, Zelda began her career as the damsel-in-distress, and the main objective of the game. In a legend that repeats throughout the years, the player learns that Zelda possess the Triforce of Wisdom. Link (male) possesses courage and Ganon (male) possesses power. This would be great if Zelda ever appeared as a wise character. Really, she rarely appeared at all. In the traditional format: Zelda appeared twice per game. Once at the beginning to kept kidnapped and once at the ending to be saved. While Link and Ganon’s characters clearly embody their main trait, Zelda never embodies hers. At least not in the beginning.

Has There Been Recent Improvement: Yes. Zelda has taken an increasingly active role in recent games. She is still usually in peril but finds ways to help Link on his quest. The character has also been more personified and even taken on a physically active role. Ocarina of Time still may represent the best leap forward as Zelda stripped off the dress and dawned fighting gear to become Sheik, a warrior who actively aided Link on his journey. Zelda fans are still waiting for a Nintendo game with a female protagonist.

Zelda was much more active as Tetra, a pirate incarnation in the Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker.
Zelda was much more active as Tetra, a pirate incarnation in the Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker.

Princess Daisy

Yes, another princess. This one is from Sarasaland… never heard of it? You and 99.999999% of people on the planet.

princessdaisyWhere She Started: Stop me if you’ve heard this one: a damsel-in-distress for Mario to save… who wasn’t Peach. Yes, over time Daisy has come to be known as Luigi’s girlfriend but when she started, she was getting saved by Mario. Daisy is… well honestly there is not much to say. She appeared in Super Mario Land for the Gameboy and since then only Mario Sports games.

Has There Been Recent Improvement: No. Nintendo does not seem to know what to do with Daisy. The recent “Year of Luigi” failed to produce any games featuring the character. Daisy is an active playable character in her sports appearances and shows traces of personality… it is just no longer clear why she’s there. Sonic has been costing on video game credit for a lot less time than Daisy. Here’s hoping the character plays a (playable) role in the next Luigi’s Mansion. That would at least be a start.

At least Daisy is making the most of her leisure time.
At least Daisy is making the most of her leisure time.

Samus Aran

Samus Aran is an intergalactic bounty hunter and the main character of the Metroid series. She is also the only character on this list that is not a princess.

super-smash-bros-wii-u-and-3ds-samus-aran-artworkWhere She Started: As a pioneer for female game characters. Samus Aran is the exact opposite of the damsel-in-distress. She is (mainly) portrayed as independent and solitary. She goes from planet to planet hunting aliens and solving puzzles. Samus is not given many clear characteristics to her personality (the player’s actions tend to form the person she is) and did not have a voice for most of her career. When she did…

Has There Been Recent Improvement: No. In fact, one could argue the exact opposite has happened. In Metroid: Other M, Samus was finally given a voice, and that was the voice of an immature girl crying out for approval from her male superiors. It was a huge set back for the formerly fully independent bounty hunter. Also, the emergence of the new “zero suit” has drawn a lot more attention to Samus’ feminine form. Here is hoping that Retro Studios can get the character back on track.

Samus' new look is just a tad more focused on the feminine.
Samus’ new look is just a tad more focused on the feminine.

Rosalina

A princess who commands the Comet Observatory, as well as serves as guardian for the Lumas.

SSB4_Rosalina_Artwork_(alt)Where She Started: Rosalina is the most recent addition to Mario’s Princess lineup. While she is not kidnapped in Super Mario Galaxy, Rosalina is quickly revealed to be powerless against Bowser. It is up to Mario (the player) to save the day and return all the Lumas to Rosalina. She does not come across as the most powerful “guardian of the cosmos” when an incredibly-gifted plumber can do more to save the galaxy than she can.

Has There Been Any Recent Improvement: Hard to say. Nintendo appears to be pushing the character at least. A recent appearance in Mario Kart 8, as well as an upcoming roster spot for the new Super Smash Bros. are signs that the company wants to keep using the character. Rosalina also appeared as an unlockable character in Super Mario 3D World.

 

Last year, Shigeru Miyamoto (the Nintendo equivalent of Jesus) was asked about his thoughts on women in video games. The video game creator touched on a main problem that Nintendo still appears to have. Yes, they have plenty of female characters now, but they have few games that directly suit them. Most of the time the woman appears as a side character while the male player character completes the action. Nintendo needs a new Metroid, a new game series surrounding a female protagonist. They just have to figure out how to accomplish it.

At least she is wearing something less ridiculous when she's driving.
At least she is wearing something less ridiculous when she’s driving.

“So, yeah, certainly, I think there are opportunities to do it. One, I think we could do it as a parody of everything else we’ve done. But I think, certainly, we would want something where it would feel like the natural way for the game to play and in that case we would certainly take that approach.”

– Shigeru Miyamoto

Oh and don’t worry: there are people already feeling threatened by Nintendo’s desire to include more female characters in Super Smash Bros.

Legendary, Universal, and the Inevitable King Kong vs. Godzilla Remake

The San Diego Comic Con, the place where movies, shows, and all other forms of entertainment go to get hyped. It doesn’t appear that companies need to show much to grab headlines. For example, examine the Warcraft movie logo. I have attached it underneath. That is all that was shown off. Yes, there is a lot to get excited about there. They do know how to spell ‘Warcraft’ correctly.

I’m not kidding, this was all they publicly showed… and people still talked about it.

Yet sometimes it is great to be teased. As a Godzilla fan, I was thrilled to hear much more on the sequel to the 2014 reboot. It seems like Toho is sending more of their monsters as at least Mothra, Rodan, and King Ghidorah are joining the fight. Again, nothing was publicly shown but at least that is an announcement that gives a large clue as to what the second American Godzilla movie will be about. The monster news did not stop there, however. Legendary Pictures appeared keen to move on its other franchises as a new Pacific Rim and King Kong movie were also teased. Wait, what? Since when has Legendary owned the film rights to King Kong?

Since July 10th apparently.

Universal Pictures and Legendary have entered a five-year partnership. They will create films together and seek ways to create profitability with whatever large franchises they own. Franchises like Universal’s King Kong and Legendary’s Godzilla. The chips are falling to create a remake of epic proportions… and really it is a no brainer.

Look at this, how does it not scream blockbuster?

When the original King Kong vs. Godzilla debuted back in 1962, it was a smash hit. The film is the highest grossing Godzilla film of all time in Japan and earned over a million dollars at the U.S. Box Office (back when that really meant something – the film was distributed for only 200k). With the recent success of crossovers like The Avengers, Hollywood knows that there is money to be made in putting franchises together. All that is needed are solo films to build hype.

That would explain the Skull Island movie announcement. King Kong has not appeared in theaters since 2005… and that movie did not leave much room for a sequel. While Peter Jackson’s King Kong arguably had more to say than most monster movies, it clearly was not made to start a franchise. This new film will likely have nothing to do with 2005 remake and simply be aimed at reestablishing Kong as the Eighth Wonder of the World… and part of the same universe as Godzilla.

Kong will have to be beefed up a bit. He is currently only 25 feet tall after all.
Kong will have to be beefed up a bit. He is currently only 25 feet tall after all.

As for the currently dubbed Godzilla 2, many Godzilla fans (myself included) were surprised at the announcement of King Ghidorah. Anyone familiar with the series knows that Ghidorah is the grand enemy of Godzilla. He is to Godzilla as Joker is to Batman – the greatest of all the villains. Hollywood appears to operate under the model of escalation for their sequels: everything has to be bigger and better in the next one. That said: why Ghidorah so soon?

King Ghidorah has appeared as the main villain in seven Godzilla movies.
King Ghidorah has appeared as the main villain in seven Godzilla movies.

Legendary has already unveiled plans for at least three Godzilla movies so the decision to include Ghidorah in the second one comes across as a bit odd. After all, what monster could create more hype than Ghidorah? Oh wait:

I would still see it.
I would still see it.

Yes, move over Batman vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice (take your skinny Wonder Woman with you), Godzilla vs. King Kong looks to be coming to theaters soon.

“Legendary continues to prove that big ideas are relevant and profitable with our global moviegoing audience.”

-Universal Studios COO Ron Meyer

Oh, and by the way: they also own Pacific Rim. Imagine that crossover.

Do You Need Feminism?

Yes.

Seriously, is this a thing? Why is this a thing right now?

tumblr_msv7ggz4TU1qf7o51o2_1280

Sigh…. all right.

This is one of those rare times in life when I will say that words truly matter. Moreover, the understanding of words and the impact they carry truly matters. Recently, the internet has been alive with the new viral slogan: “I don’t need feminism…” You can see one of its supporters above. In the face of it, this is a perplexing image. That woman does not look stupid. She has at least mastered writing… and wearing a shirt.

What the f*ck then?

In looking at these pictures and touring the websites, I have made a discovery: there are a lot of people out there who don’t know the actual definition of feminism. So, real quick – here it is:

Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending a state of equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment.”

Google the definition of feminism and that’s what you get. Also, have the Merriam-Webster definition for good measure. So really, what is the issue? According to definition, feminism sounds pretty reasonable to me – and I’m a guy. I gain nothing from sharing my power and rights with women but – I believe women are people (crazy) – so this really is a non-issue. Except it is an issue apparently, though not with “feminism” as it is defined above. Let’s look at a few more beacons of human hope:

Okay, but based on the definition of feminism - this doesn't make sense.
Okay, but based on the definition of feminism – this doesn’t make sense.
Again, nowhere in the definition does it say women are at a disadvantage.
Again, nowhere in the definition does it say that being a woman is a disadvantage.
Well this just... wait, what's that in the corner?
Well this just… wait, what’s that in the corner?

I think I have found the problem. Not only do people not know what “feminism” means, they are supporting a false definition. In the lower right corner, it reads “radical feminism sucks” – just in case you were wondering. “Radical” by definition means extreme and extreme ideologies, by tradition, tend to suck. Are there radical feminists out there who have demonized men as “villains” in an extreme distortion of basic views. Yes, idiots exist (I have pictures of four of them above). That said, those people are not the definition of feminism. They are not even really part of the movement.

Let’s use another definition to make an example: let’s use Christianity. Christianity is the belief in Jesus as Jesus Christ, the son of god and savior to mankind. Ever read the Bible? Jesus seems to be a very tolerant and open guy whose only real problem is the hoarding of wealth and the mistreatment of the poor (boy, he would love America right now). That said, there are radical Christians who believe that Jesus hates gays, immigrants, women, etc. etc. insert minority group here. Hating feminism because of radical feminists is like hating Christianity because of radical Christians.

Actually, it’s probably worse since there exists serious inequality out there between men and women. To anyone who doesn’t believe that: open your eyes. Watch the news.

So, the definition of feminism is becoming distorted and that is a shame. We need to take control of this word back. If the definition loses its meaning, this is a setback for human rights. Feminism is not an invalid movement. Human rights are not something you don’t need because a small number may abuse them.

Yet websites like this one keep existing.

I have written before on the dangers of willful ignorance: the belief that you and you alone hold the answers and any “facts” that say otherwise are either coming from a biased or erroneous source. When people are willfully ignorant, they ignore their own bias, they ignore their ability to be wrong. It must be wonderful to be right all the time, but I’m pretty sure it’s not a human trait.

Everyone knows that pretty quotes are the most true.
Everyone knows that pretty quotes are the most true.

Women Against Feminism is run by women. Emily Shire, a sane individual judging from her writing, tried to reach out and understand this group more thoroughly. Please find her article here.

Will this movement die? Very likely. It is fundamentally idiotic. When even Urban Dictionary can give this as a definition, there is little hope that these extremists will derail the feminist movement. Personally, I don’t need people who say they don’t need feminism. I would only ask that they read the dictionary.

When you don't know what a word means, you risk looking like an idiot (by the way, this photo was taken for solely ironic purposes).
When you don’t know what a word means, you risk looking like an idiot (by the way, this photo was taken for solely ironic purposes).