Blog

About that Ending: The Legend of Korra (Season One)

After making some comments on M. Night Shyamalan’s The Last Airbender, I figured it would be fun making serious comments on something actually Avatar-related. The Legend of Korra is the second show in the series, picking up roughly 70 years after the events of Avatar: the Last Airbender. Avatar Aang has passed and now the fate of the world rests on the shoulders of Korra, our new Avatar and central protagonist. I can still remember how excited I was when this show was announced: a new Avatar with a female main character? Anyone who knows the first series knows that this show is second to Buffy with how strongly the female characters are written. Toph, Katara, Azula, Suki, Ty Lee, Mai: every one of these is a flushed out and interesting human being. In a world where strong feminine characters are still evolving, it is nice to see that there is an animated series already doing it right. Creators/writers Michael Dante DiMartino and Bryan Konietzko should be proud of the work they’ve done. Anyway, I’m getting sidetracked, back to Korra.

So naturally, with all that in mind, I was excited for the Legend of Korra. For the most part, I walked away from this first season happy. Twelve episodes is a short running time and it forces a concentration in story and in characters. Does Legend of Korra accomplish this while still being an entertaining series: yes. Was the season finale adequate for a first season: yes. Was the season finale adequate as a series finale (as intended by the creators): NO. What went wrong then? Ironically enough, I believe that the strengths of Avatar: the Last Airbender became the Legend of Korra‘s weaknesses. In short, Korra is not a strong female character.

Woah, bold declaration there. At first glance, this seems obviously wrong. Korra is  a confident, physically and emotionally strong woman. So how is she not a strong female protagonist? Warning: spoilers to follow.

Let’s focus on the last two episodes, the season finale of the Legend of Korra. In these two episodes a lot happens. Amon is unmasked and defeated, Asami confronts her father, Korra loses her bending ability, Korra becomes a full-fledged Avatar, Korra and Mako get together. Lots going on, most of it involving Korra.

First thing: Amon. I’m not going to debate whether his reveal (anti-climactic or not) was well-executed, I’m more going to focus on Avatar Korra’s role in it. Essentially, she has none. Yes, she outs Amon as a bloodbender but there is no earning of knowledge. We’ve already established Korra as a headstrong fighter, but how about an intelligent human being? Aang and his friends discovered truths in the first series. Here, Amon’s identity drops right into Korra’s lap courtesy of Tarrlok. Without him, Korra never would have figured it out and it’s not like Avatar Aang hadn’t been trying to help her.

Throughout the first season, Korra experiences flashbacks into Aang’s life. As she cannot directly converse with him until the end, these visions are all Korra has to go on. They deal with the character of Yakone, an especially powerful bloodbender whom Aang defeated years ago. Korra uses these visions to figure out the identity of Tarrlok (Yakone’s son) but fails to connect the larger dots that Aang is trying to warn her about Amon as well (Yakone’s other son). With such focus on the visions, it is bizarre to see them dismissed so quickly by Korra after the Yakone reveal. So Korra does not appear overly intelligent, but it does fall into the realm of realism.

Really this is a problem more with the show’s writing than with the character of its protagonist. As I said, we spend a good deal of time with the visions throughout the first season only to have them dropped immediately after Tarrlok’s reveal. If Aang was trying to warn Korra about Amon (and why wouldn’t he be?) the visions should have continued after Tarrlok’s defeat. Stopping them sent the message, to both Korra and the audience, that there was nothing more relevant about the nature of these flashbacks. Giving even one more would have given Korra an opportunity to think things out and not rely so heavily on Tarrlok for literally every crucial bit of information regarding Amon. She’s supposed to be strong yet there is a man solving one of her problems.

Next time a man solves her problems: Mako. Korra is defeated by Amon and stripped of her bending ability. Woah! Amon is powerful, and Korra cannot enter the Avatar state so this is believable. It loses me when Mako is able to best Amon in combat, allowing the two to escape. The whole first season has established two things: how strong of a bender Korra is and how unbelievably powerful Amon’s abilities are. In the finale, the audience is expecting to see these two forces clash. They do and Amon wins. Now comes in Mako, also established as a talented bender (although not so much as Korra) and he does more against Amon than the main protagonist. It is good to show Korra needing help, that’s fine. But how is Mako able to do what she cannot? Why does she need him to save her in that situation? Korra’s character has weaknesses and faults but her bending ability isn’t one of them.

Why did no one do this before?
Why did no one do this before?

True, Korra does deliver the final blow to Amon later, using her airbending to knock him out a window. How exactly the reveal of Amon as a bender defeats the Equalist Movement is beyond me (if anything I think it strengthens their case) but this is not an article focused on that aspect of the ending. We’ll stick to Korra and leave the (so disappointing) finale with the Equalists for another day.

Downfall of a man but not a cause.
Downfall of a man but not a cause.

So Korra defeats Amon with some help. That’s fine. Tarrlok ultimately kills Amon, which is also fine. Korra doesn’t need to be a killer to be strong. Yet at the finale she is weak, fragile. She has lost all her bending ability except for her airbending. This is huge. As stated before, Korra is a character who prides herself on her bending ability, it is central to her identity as the Avatar and as a person. Now, she has lost most of it. Will this begin a new struggle of Korra redefining herself and growing through loss and setback? Oh wait, Aang is going to appear and give her back everything she lost in two seconds… that just doesn’t work.

I can understand why the writers did it. They said before that they did not want the Legend of Korra to follow a similar story structure to Avatar: the Last Airbender. The audience has already seen a show about an Avatar learning the bending arts, I can understand not want to see one about an Avatar re-learning the bending arts. Nevertheless, Aang’s actions are simply too jarring. He does everything for Korra. She literally just cries and gets her way. Aang appears, restores her powers and everyone is happy. Did Korra grow as a person? Debatable. Being sad is not really character growth. This is yet another instance of a male character appearing to give great aid to Korra. She really has needed a lot of help and contributed very little to this season finale so far.

Avatar Aang: dead and still more capable than Korra.
Avatar Aang: dead and still more capable than Korra.

Let’s move onto the final thing: the kiss with Mako. This is probably my largest problem with both the finale and the series so far. Who the hell is Mako and why do they like each other? The romance between Aang and Katara in Avatar: the Last Airbender was sweet and, more importantly, developed with a very natural and believable flow. The romance between Korra and Mako does not possess these qualities. Yes, we get the Korra has a crush on Mako but why? Mako is honestly portrayed as a jerk in the season. He kisses Korra right after she dates Bolin, then leaves her to date Asami. He then leaves Asami for Korra right after Asami loses her father, her money and essentially all her identity. Wow, sounds like a winner so far. He has no real strong aspects to his character (having a scarf does not count).

The sole thing Mako does in the first season to institute a romance is carry Korra in his arms after finding her. Does this mean that Korra naturally develops relationships to male saviors? Does her character want to be protected after all? Is the tough girl attitude all an act? I don’t know but it warrants exploration. Exploration that I hope the rest of the series pursues. Exploration that is, at the moment, completely unsatisfied by a bizarre kiss and a declaration of “I love you”. Do they? I may not be a smart man, but I know what love is… and that shit ain’t it.

"Korra, look at my scarf. Look at my face. I'm gorgeous, you're gorgeous - we should date."
“Korra, look at my scarf. Look at my face. I’m gorgeous, you’re gorgeous – we should date.”

Despite all these problems, I do like the Legend of Korra. I enjoyed the season finale when I watched it and still think it’s fine. It’s saving grace is just that: it’s a first season. Hopefully the audience will get to watch these characters grow throughout the series and most of these issues will be addressed. If not, rest assured you will be seeing another one of these articles.

One last note and a bit of a side thing: when writing a tight story in twelve episodes: everything has to be essential. Pro-bending, arguably the most fun aspect season one, takes up several episodes before exiting halfway through the season. Was it awesome to watch: yes. Was it completely unnecessary to the plot: yes. Could that time have been spent better developing characters and avoiding the above-mentioned problems: sadly yes. Something to work on in the coming seasons.

Thoughts? Comments? Am I full of shit or onto something? Let me know now in the feedback section of this article.

Forgotten Classics: The Last Airbender

Words cannot describe how serious I’m being right now. There’s a lot of other wonderful movies out there: Batman and Robin, Alien Resurrection, Street Fighter: the Legend of Chun-Li. All of these films are perfect ways to spend an evening. Have a significant other you’re trying to impress? Can’t go wrong with those. M. Night Shyamalan, the incredibly talented director of the movie I’m about to describe, has directed other such films of this quality as well. I’m of course talking about the heartfelt tale of Lady in the Water and the wonderfully atmospheric The Happening. Yet in 2010, M. Night eclipsed his other work with an adaptation of the Nickelodeon animated series, Avatar: the Last Airbender.

Right away there is an improvement in the title. Avatar, you mean that riveting character-driven drama by James Cameron? Nay, this is simply The Last Airbender. I wish more movie titles would follow the brilliant marketing strategy used by this movie. I don’t know about the rest of you but I am already horribly confused over Legendary’s upcoming remake of Godzilla. I would like to think it’s a monster movie but with the word “God” in the title, how can I be sure? Maybe director Gareth Edwards is filming a religious drama on the god, Zilla? I don’t know: it’s too complicated for me. Anyway, forget that movie. We’re here to talk genius – The Last Airbender genius.

There is a great challenge in adapting any television show into a movie. Right away the question is raised: what makes the cut? TV shows have time to develop characters, pursue side plots and stage dramatic confrontations. They have significant hours, a movie only has between two and three hours to tell the same story. Similar challenges are raised with book adaptations as well. Anyway, anyone who has seen Avatar: the Last Airbender knows the quality of the show. The first season alone introduces the major characters of Aang, Sokka, Katara, Zuko, Iroh, Roku and Suki. Don’t worry, they’re are all there in the Shyamalan cut… well except Roku and Suki. Who needed them anyway?

So, perfect so far. What about the other side of adaptation, the oh-so-important plot points of the story? Once again, Avatar: the Last Airbender is a complex show. In addition to the character stories, there are several other thematic structures at work. The struggle to restore balance, the invasive nature of the Industrial Revolution, the monomythical philosophy of Joseph Campbell, the Shakespearean struggle of self-worth – point is shit goes down in twenty episodes a season. The Last Airbender may not have time for all these subtleties but it does a competent job. There’s… scenes of fighting and implied journeying. I think Aang and Katara hug at one point and Zuko mentions honor so, there you go! It’s all there.

Let’s actually talk about the fighting for a bit. Avatar: the Last Airbender has some of the most fluidly animated fighting of any series. The feeling of connectivity between movement and bending allow the viewer to believe the battle in front of their eyes. Again it is a tough challenge to meet. Did M. Night Shyamalan accomplish it? You better believe it. Just look at this:

Let the awesomeness of this scene sink in. Don’t worry, the rest of the film is just as well executed.

I don’t feel the need to say anymore on that subject.

The Last Airbender is an exceptional achievement of storytelling and direction. Now the question comes: why isn’t it more popular. Short answer: people can’t handle it. They start watching this masterpiece and freak out, usually being like: “can’t handle this, I’m going to just watch the show or a bad movie like the Lord of the Rings instead.” It’s a usual reaction. Don’t be ashamed if you’ve felt something similar watching this movie, it just means your mind is too small for the genius of M. Night Shyamalan.

There is good news. Most stores are practically giving this movie away at no cost so you can very easily make it the crown jewel of your video library. Most likely this is one of the latest forms of public service, similar to the creation of the library. Everyone deserves to benefit from a creative genius like M. Night Shyamalan so he has made his movie cheaply affordable for us. Not to be easily likened to the divinity of Christ but yeah, it’s pretty much on the same level.

Hundreds are films are made every year but there are few diamonds in the ruff. And there is only one The Last Airbender.

Seriously thank Christ for that. April Fools of course. Although I feel I must make one thing clear: do not see this movie. If you feel you must, DO NOT GIVE MONEY TO IT. This is a violation of great art that should not be condoned. I, as a fan of the show, gave money to this in theaters and I feel I am a worse person for doing so. How bad is The Last Airbender? If I were given the choice between seeing it again and being castrated, I would see it again… but I would have to think about it. Anytime a person considers castration: you know you might be dealing with one of the most offensively bad movies in existence. Oh well, at least it’s not the Star Wars Holiday Special.

Happy April Fools!

Overstaying its Welcome: Amazing Spider-Man (the Video Game)

Like many out there, I went to theaters this past summer to see a superhero movie. No, I’m not talking about the Avengers or the Dark Knight Rises (both of which were better than the film I’m about to name), I’m talking Spider-Man and not just any: that shit was supposed to be Amazing. The Amazing Spider-Man may have felt more like a safely-plotted retelling of the first Sam Raimi Spider-Man than a bold new imagining but it was still decent. Yes it was disappointing that human character Dr. Connors went full blown mustache-twirling super villain after his first transformation into the Lizard and true, Peter Parker really does come off as a total dick to Gwen Stacy at the end (break up with someone and refuse to be there for them during a traumatic death of a loved one, sure that relationship is healthy) but the Amazing Spider-Man was still a fun popcorn movie of the summer. Good news to all of you (maybe there are 5?) out there who can’t wait for the Amazing Spider-Man 2 in 2014: there is already a sequel.

The Amazing Spider-Man (video game), developed  by Quebec’s own Beenox, picks up several months after the first film ends. The plot is actually a fairly clever and believable tie-in to the movie. Oscorp, trying to capitalize on the Lizard formula, hires Alistair Smythe to oversee all future genetic experiments as well as helm the nanobot program. Anyone who has read the comics knows that shenanigans are coming and for those who haven’t, spoiler: shenanigans. Faced with a hybrid and nanobot menace, Peter and Dr. Connors join forces and fight for the fate of New York City. Great, that’s the plot but is it good?

Short answer: Eh, kinda? I’ve often heard Spider-Man 2 called the pinnacle of the Spider-Man video games. Personally I’m not sure why 2 is held at this level. In my mind it is a fun game but flawed. Really that is the same basic critique I would give to this new one. When I first started playing the Amazing Spider-Man, I was having a lot of fun with it. Then there came a point where I was ready for the game to end; problem was there was still several hours to go.

So what happened? How did it lose me? When did my smile turn into the face of frustration playing this game? The answer is obvious: when this game stopped giving me new challenges and instead recycled bosses into newer, more aggravating scenarios. That was the moment I cried foul.

Sometimes boss repetition can be fun. I remember always getting freaked out by the Nemesis in Resident Evil 3. So why doesn’t it work here? I believe some bad design choices determined that. Let me throw you an example: fairly early on in the game, Spider-Man does battle with an evil killer robot called a Hunter (creative name right?). The Hunter is a fast, flying attack drone and the resulting gameplay is pretty fun. Web-zipping from building to building while attacking an aerial attack robot is an experience unique to the Spider-Man games. The Amazing Spider-Man then ups the challenge by throwing a giant metal snake at you: again awesome. What’s next game? A transformer? A giant robot hawk of some kind? Oh, oh three Hunters that’s… actually just kind of annoying.

The controls in this game are not the tightest. While that allows for some cool animation and a fun battle with one Hunter, three of them simply exposes  flaws in Spider-Man’s handling. It is frustrating to try and dodge so much while still attacking. If a new enemy was throwing that kind of challenge at me it would be one thing but these guys are anything but. It comes off as tedious to beat them and it feels lazy on the part of the developers. With all the Spider-Man villains, I have to fight this twice? Oh I also have to fight the Rhino, the Scorpion, and the Vermin multiple times as well? You can fuck off, game.

It’s not like the Amazing Spider-Man would have a short game with single encounters for these bosses, it’s not even like short games are necessarily bad (Luigi’s Mansion anyone?). An enjoyable six hours is always better than a mediocre eight or an oh-god-end ten. The Amazing Spider-Man is ultimately a movie tie-in so that cripples the storytelling. There is no way it can end doing anything too crazy cause odds are the no one making the Amazing Spider-Man 2 actually played this game. So I have a fun story but not one I can care too much about: perfect for a short game. It is really unfortunate that Beenox stretched things, otherwise I would be much more positive about this game. Heck I might even call it the best Spider-Man game ever (maybe)!

Want my advice? Play until you feel it. When the tedium comes, you’ll know. It will wash over your features, making you numb to whatever charms the game initially possessed. It sucks to leave a game with a crappy last impression (thank you Citadel for saving Mass Effect 3). Beenox deserves a pat on the back before the scolding. They did a good job… if only for six hours. Incidentally, there is a Wii U version of this game being released soon. Maybe that will fix some of the problems in the Xbox 360 build. Personally I kind of doubt it but you never know. I’m still trying to figure out why make this game on Wii U in the first place.

Thoughts? Comments? Am I full of shit or onto something? Let me know now in the feedback section of this article.