The NFL Clusterf*ck: Ray Rice, Adrian Peterson, and Abuse

Warning: the following post contains disturbing images and video.

 

Can you tell another human being how to live their life? Do you have the right? What makes a good person and a bad person?

For the past few weeks, the NFL (National Football League) has made headlines. Regrettably, football has not been involved. First came the Ray Rice scandal. For those of you who do not know, Baltimore Ravens receiver Ray Rice entered an elevator with his then-fiancé (they are now married), Janay. Then, this happened:

No charges were filed and the NFL suspended Rice for two games. Then, that video was released and Ray Rice was suspended indefinitely by the NFL. Rice has recently appealed his suspension, and his wife Janay continues to insist that the media has blown the entire thing out of proportion.

rice-instagram
Actual Instagram response from Rice’s wife.

Due to their reluctant and forced handling of the issue, the NFL became swamped in scandal, with many feeling that Commissioner Roger Goodell must resign for his involvement in attempting to swipe what happened under the rug. For the record: the Ray Rice scandal was not the only one going on at this point, simply the one involving the most famous player. For a few weeks, Rice was the name on everyone’s lips in regards to the NFL.

Then Adrian Peterson happened.

Peterson was arrested and charged for beating his four year old son with a tree branch. Peterson also allegedly stuffed leaves into the child’s mouth to prevent him from screaming. Below are the photos taken ONE WEEK after the beating took place (I do not have to say ‘alleged’ as Peterson has already admitted to doing it).

abuseToday, Peterson as been activated by the Minnesota Vikings. He is expected to fully participate and play, while receiving his complete salary.

 

I felt I could not say any of that while being my usual smug, cheeky self. Again, I will mention that these are not the only two problem players in the NFL. These scandals have raised a lot of questions. Many have to do with morality and social responsibility.

“Don’t tell me how to live my life!”

This is a philosophy that many individuals in “free” countries adhere to. Indeed, what is the point of freedom without the ability to choose what kind of life to lead? If we are to go by the words and opinions of Janay and Ray Rice, than the world (through the media) has intruded on their privacy and their right to live. To hear Janay speak, theirs is a complicated love that only they can understand, and the rest of the world is rushing to ruin what a good thing they have.

Adrian Peterson is trying to discipline his child. At least that’s what people like Charles Barkley and many others think. Don’t tell him how to raise his kid. Don’t tell Ray and Janay how to live their lives.

Okay.

I had one professor in my time at University who was brilliant. He gave me an essential lesson that I will not forget and that I believe applies here: Some opinions are wrong. Is everyone entitled to a point of view – absolutely. Is that point of view immediately valid and equal to all others – not a chance in hell. In this era of understanding, I feel that society is in danger of losing a crucial truth. Sometimes people are full of sh*t.

There is NO defense for people like Ray Rice and Adrian Peterson. I am not saying they are monsters, but I am saying that they each committed a crime that is indefensible. In what scenario is it okay for an NFL athlete to strike an unarmed woman? Or for a father to brutally beat his child with a tree branch? There is none. The discussion ends there. For any saying, “it is a cultural difference, or they probably learned it from their parents”. Please listen to Cris Carter below:

He is absolutely right. Never once in history has “well that’s how it used to be done” been a valid reason to prevent enlightenment. Progress means change and it means growth and we have overall grown as a society. Any individuals out there who use their upbringing as an excuse for their actions – that is the immature response of a child. We live in an age with actual unlimited access to education. It is called the internet and its greatest power is its ability to collect and pool all human knowledge. Does it pool other crap, sure – but the fact remains.

No one forced Rice or Peterson to behave that way. They made the decision, the decision to continue vicious cycles that probably began much earlier in their lives. That decision was wrong, and both of them were wrong for doing it. Their athletic ability should not and does not matter. Ray Rice is a miserable excuse for a partner and Adrian Peterson has a hell of a lot to learn about being a father.

As for Janay, it is a tragic truth that many abuse victims justify their mistreatment. She is wrong as well. Her opinion and view of her relationship come off as nothing more than a horrible fantasy that the rest of the world recognizes for the farce it is.

People have the right to ruin their own lives. That right ends the moment another person becomes involved. Adrian Peterson didn’t hurt himself – he savagely beat a four year old boy. Ray Rice punched his wife in the face. I sincerely hope that that relationship does not create children.

People have the right to ruin their own lives, until another person becomes involved. Fun fact about society is that everyone is interconnected. No one has the right to waste a life because it always matters to someone else. Actions like these are not defensible. This is not a debate on morality. The human race is sadly gifted at self-justification.

No one likes being blamed and everyone out there can come up with an excuse for practically anything. As a species, we have been able to justify such atrocities as slavery, the Holocaust, and repressing human rights. People do not want to be labeled as “bad people.” The horrible truth is that bad people do not exist. Neither do good people. There are just people, and people have the choice to do what they will. In their mind, that action will always be good (if not immediately than after much rationalization and self-justification).

But this is the 21st century. People need to grow up and be held accountable for their actions. Not every scenario has two valid sides. Abuse is wrong. Period.

Let’s hope the NFL does not let profits stand in the way of humanity. Actually no, let’s not hope for that. Let’s hold people responsible for their actions. Let’s stop rationalizing and take a stand. We’re human beings – let’s act like it.

"I am not a perfect son. I am not a perfect husband. I am not a perfect parent, but I am, without a doubt, not a child abuser. I am someone that disciplined his child and did not intend to cause him any injury." That's his mugshot, by the way.
“I am not a perfect son. I am not a perfect husband. I am not a perfect parent, but I am, without a doubt, not a child abuser. I am someone that disciplined his child and did not intend to cause him any injury.”
That’s his mugshot, by the way.

Silly Things Written on the Internet: 1 "Super Cute" Lesbian Wedding Idea

This entire post is written in response to this BuzzFeed article. As always, I mean no criticism to the author. Flo Perry is a creative woman who has written some cool and interesting things to read. I suggest you check out her work. That said, everyone writes things that can come off as… silly.

Weddings are incredible ordeals. They are a staggering show of commitment. Two individuals agree to share their lives together. More than that, they fulfill a contractual agreement stating that they will share their lives together. Damn, that idea is terrifyingly adult. With all that said, I feel that labeling any aspect of a wedding as ‘super cute’ is to use the complete set of wrong language. It would be on par with labeling a successful open-heart surgery as ‘fantastically adorable.’

Look at how precious their matching outfits are!
Look at how precious their matching outfits are!

All joking aside, that’s a nitpick. Weddings are beautiful occasions and words like cute, beautiful, adorable – these positive terms should be tossed around freely.

Now here is my one suggestion, the bizarre omission that I felt justified an article response.

1. Do Something that Embodies Your Relationship

A lot of these 23 suggestions have to do with celebrating being gay. To me, this makes as little sense as this following suggestion for interracial marriage: have half the aisle wear white and the other half wear black. I do not mean to undermine the enormous struggle that gays have gone/are still going through in beginning to achieve marital equality. It is a victory that is not yet complete in these United States.

HOWEVER

To reduce a relationship to something as non-character oriented as sexuality strikes me as insulting. I would not like it if someone came up to me and offered this suggestion: “so is everyone on your side going to dress like a guy, and everyone on her side dress like a girl?”

I’m hammering in the point because I feel like it is a big one.

If both people involved are human rights’ activists then yes, by all means – have a wedding that celebrates the fantastic achievement that is gay marriage. To say that “you’re gay, I bet you love rainbow cake on your wedding!” is stereotyping.

Do something to celebrate your relationship, not your sexuality (unless of course, those two ideas do not conflict). If you’re Star Wars geeks – have a Star Wars themed wedding. If you met while scuba diving on shipwrecks – use that theme. Judging people as extensions of their sexuality is not a way to know them. It is a way to create laughable caricatures such as this:

I may be wrong on this issue. I may be downplaying the incredible solidarity and courage that the Gay Pride movement brings to people. If that is the case: I do apologize. This just struck me as a very bizarre article to write. Again, I do not mean to single out Flo Perry, I do not believe that she meant this to be insulting or anything negative at all. This article, to me, represents a greater problem when viewing people. Judge a person by the content of their character… not by their sexuality (or race, gender – anything of this nature). To do anything less appears kind of, well – silly.

Why would lesbians want roller-derby flower girls more than anyone else?
Why would lesbians want roller-derby flower girls more than anyone else?

The Topless Question and Oh, about Those Celebrity Leaks

Right away, it should be obvious to tell that this post will focus on issues much more directly regarding women. Men cannot go topless. Men can only take off their shirts.

This sign highlights one of the common views on the physical differences between men and women pretty aptly.
This sign highlights one of the common views on the physical differences between men and women pretty aptly.

There is a truly bizarre fascination with nudity in this world. To my knowledge, no one has ever died from nudity. No child ever saw the nude form and was struck blind, regardless of what certain religious doctrines claim. Yet if you listen to most civilized cultures out there: being naked in public is one of the most damaging things an individual can do. There are laws (some very strict) against it.

Now, before I continue, let me just say that some of these laws are very good and serve a purpose. Being naked by itself may not be dangerous, however there are plenty of perverts and deviants out there who can use nudity to harm society. Laws against these people are a necessity and increase safety as well as allowing individuals to grow up unscathed from horrible memories. Yet those people aside… just how dangerous is nudity?

Fun fact: the concept for the film Human Centipede was imagined as a fitting sentence for sex offenders and child rapists. I will let the debate on this punishment land where it will.
Fun fact: the concept for the film Human Centipede was imagined as a fitting sentence for sex offenders and child rapists. I will let the debate on this punishment land where it will.

Well… it isn’t. Few studies have been done on the effects of family/parental nudity in front of minors, but one of the most thorough “found no ill effect and no good effects of parental nudity.” Again, this is in regards to simply nudity – without any sexual intent. Yet it is this differentiation that is likely the main problem. Where does nudity end and sexuality begin?

Well it seems that, for women, sexuality begins the very moment that they remove their top and expose their breasts. Written like that, it does not sound stimulating (or maybe it does, I don’t judge) but that is how most media-created sex scenes begin. The aroused woman tossing off her top to indicate that she is ready to begin. This image has become so entrenched in sexuality that it is impossible to be seen as a simple act of nudity… or then again, maybe most men are just really turned on by boobs.

Beginning a sexual act in public is, at the very least, likely impolite. It is not hard to see how the label “indecent” was ascribed to such actions. Yet what if a woman simply wants to remove her top? After all, men do it all the time and there is no overt association with sexual intent. In the name of equality: shouldn’t all women be allowed to go topless at their leisure (or at least only bound by the same restrictions that affect men).

Go Topless is a movement to empower women to be able to go topless without fear of criminal reprocussions. The movement has gone to several major cities, including Montreal.
Go Topless is a movement to empower women to be able to go topless without fear of criminal repercussions. The movement has gone to several major cities, including Montreal.

Well, even the most fervent human rights activist will acknowledge the physical difference between men and women. Men don’t have breasts, women do – so of course the rules are different. Really though, it is not simply for the reason listed above that most societies discourage toplessness (or nudity in general). The concerned citizen will say that it is to dangerous for a woman to just walk around topless. It could give the wrong idea.

Right – while that may be true, let’s quickly examine that argument in all its glory. It implies that a great enough percentage of men will rape at the mere sight of breasts to create this atmosphere of extreme hostility. Boy, that does not give us guys much credit. Also pokes a hole in the whole sexist attitude of men being superior. If our minds are superior to women, why is it that we can be reduced to primal instinct with the removal of a couple garments? Does not sound like the superior sex to me.

h6AD6A382

Second argument: the human body is shameful and should be hidden. Right… I have written about this before. Needless to say, I find this argument to be… I believe the most politically correct term I can use is f*cking stupid.

The idea that nudity will make people indecent in character. Well, let’s look at a recent example:

ABOUT THOSE CELEBRITY LEAKS

A presumably clothed person did something VERY indecent and exposed a lot of people who wished to keep their nude forms a secret.

Now before I go further, I feel I should make my general stance on this issue known. It is a crime what happened to the celebrities involved. It was nothing less than an invasion and subsequent theft of private materials. The hacker (whoever he or she may be) should be arrested and held fully accountable to the standard of the law. Apple should also be held accountable for allowing the leak to happen and for their blatant overuse of the Cloud (it is hard to truly delete something when it is quietly backed up to another source). To those on the internet – the internet is a moral-free highway of information. Nothing can or should be stopped from being filtered through. We cannot close the internet to “indecent material” without creating a very slippery slope as to what indecent material is. Illegal material (such as child pornography) is, of course, another matter entirely.

So that being said, you have the right to use the internet to share those pictures. Those celebrities also have the right to hunt you down and persecute you to the fullest extent of the law. It is their wrongfully seized material after all, this is not a case of the Beyonce Super Bowl photo. You decide if it’s really worth it.

There is a huge difference between sharing this public photo and stealing nudes from people who never wanted to share them. Remember that.
There is a huge difference between sharing this public photo and stealing nudes from people who never wanted to share them. Remember that.

All that said, this is not the first time that private material has been stolen or even the first time that nudes have been stolen and posted without consent. There is a sick obsession with celebrities that I believe went indecent long before those pictures were leaked. Also, in terms of the scale of crimes and atrocities happening in the world – this is really at the lower end of the totem pole. With all due respect to those affected (again, it is a crime). Personally, if I was told that I could eradicate two out of three crimes from the world and my choices were: stopping invasion of privacy in terms of identity theft, stopping invasion of privacy in terms of publishing private and personal documents, and stopping invasion of privacy in terms of stopping nude leaks… it would be an easy choice as to which would be leftover.

Yet it is this obsession with the taboo of nudity that helped turn this into such an issue. Yes, there may well have also been some misogynistic intent involved. I’m sure there are those sick individuals out there who view these talented women (yes, primarily women targeted… few people seem to care about nude male celebrities) as nothing more than collections of attractive body parts. This is problem completely unrelated to nudity, privacy, or anything else. It is a much greater problem that results in most of the unequal treatment towards women.

3fc9cb5645b894d2be23bf4259186c75cf6940355a7fef26dd301a2d4fde12ac

Many people, however, have probably only looked on curiosity and arousal. Society conditions us that every showing of the nude female form is sexual, so these can be seen as nothing less. In terms of judging these actions, it is hard to. Please do not look at anyone’s stolen material, there is enough out there that is completely legal and well (or at least slightly more) accepted in this bizarre taboo of nudity.

Yet, as long as these taboos exist, incidents like this will continue. As long as people demand nudity, that forbidden fruit of indecency, it will be in high demand.

The moral dilemma facing most people right now.
The moral dilemma facing most people right now.

 

For those out there wondering, spoiler alert: all of those celebrities did indeed have breasts and vaginas. I know right, stop the f*cking presses.